Critical Race Theory (CRT) began in American law schools in the 1970s and 1980s. Its core claim was simple: racism isn’t just about individual prejudice, it’s “systemic.” It argued that laws, institutions, and social structures all perpetuate inequality — even without overt racist intent.

Over time, CRT spread beyond law into education, sociology, and eventually mainstream culture. What started as a narrow legal framework morphed into a sweeping worldview with some recurring themes:

In practice, CRT often turns into a lens where every interaction, every institution, every tradition must be examined through race and power.

CRT insists on dividing people into groups: white vs. non-white, oppressor vs. oppressed. But reality is far more complex. People are individuals with unique lives, choices, and experiences. Reducing everyone to racial categories strips away humanity and erases nuance.

In CRT frameworks, white people are told they’re complicit in oppression simply by existing. But there’s no clear way out of this guilt. You can’t change your skin color. You can’t escape “privilege.” It becomes an endless cycle of shame without redemption.

CRT often treats concepts like “merit,” “objectivity,” or “colorblindness” as tools of oppression. But those are precisely the values that allow for fairness and equality. To reject them is to reject the very foundation of justice.

Good theories can be tested and disproven. CRT can’t. If you deny racism, you’re accused of fragility. If you agree, you’re complicit. Either way, CRT wins. That makes it more like dogma than scholarship.

Schools, corporations, and communities that adopt CRT-inspired training often see more division, not less. People walk away angry, resentful, or alienated. Far from healing wounds, CRT deepens them.

If CRT has been challenged and debunked, why does it still spread?

Guilt sells. Entire industries now profit from CRT-based diversity training, anti-racism workshops, and corporate compliance programs. There’s money in perpetuating the narrative of oppression and privilege.

CRT gives activists a sense of moral superiority. If the world is divided into oppressors and oppressed, they get to position themselves as the righteous fighters on behalf of the marginalized. It feels powerful.

Life is messy. Injustice exists, but it doesn’t always fall neatly along racial lines. CRT simplifies the mess: white bad, non-white good. Oppressor vs. oppressed. That oversimplification makes it easy to teach, easy to spread, and easy to enforce.

Universities, NGOs, and some spiritual communities have bought in. Once CRT becomes embedded in curricula, it takes on a life of its own. Teachers pass it on not necessarily because it works, but because it’s become the orthodoxy of their circles.

The very essence of yoga is union — dissolving divisions of race, gender, class, and ego. Spiritual practice is about seeing beyond the small self into the larger whole. CRT, on the other hand, doubles down on identity, insisting that race is primary and inescapable. These are opposite worldviews.

Yoga and Qigong are meant to free people from suffering, not load them with new guilt or shame. CRT teaches white practitioners to carry racial guilt and non-white practitioners to carry permanent victimhood. That’s bondage, not liberation.

Spiritual practice brings people together. Communities of practice are meant to transcend differences, focusing on breath, posture, stillness, and compassion. CRT splits people apart. It sows suspicion, resentment, and hierarchy.

Teacher trainings should be about asana, pranayama, meditation, philosophy. Injecting CRT into the curriculum hijacks the focus, turning spiritual training into political indoctrination. Students pay for yoga and end up getting sociology.

Yoga is already vulnerable to Western distortion (fitness rebrands, Instagram aesthetics). Adding CRT only distorts it further, pulling it away from its roots and into culture wars that have nothing to do with its essence.

I don’t deny that racism exists. I don’t deny that history is messy. But CRT isn’t the solution — and it definitely isn’t yoga.

I’ve lived through it personally. I signed up for yoga teacher trainings and found myself force-fed guilt and political lectures instead of yoga. It didn’t deepen my practice. It made me angry. It made me want to quit.

And I know I’m not alone.

Spiritual practice should be a refuge, not another battleground in the culture wars. It should be a space where the breath matters more than your skin color, where the yamas and niyamas matter more than ideology.

  1. Protect Yoga from Politics. Teacher trainings must stick to yoga — its philosophy, practice, and lineage — not co-opt it as a platform for ideology.
  2. Refuse Guilt as a Practice. Spiritual work should free, not burden. Students should never be told their identity makes them guilty or unworthy.
  3. Return to Universality. Yoga is for everyone. It doesn’t matter what color you are, what language you speak, what country you’re from. Breath is breath. Stillness is stillness. Spirit is spirit.

Critical Race Theory might have some traction in law schools or activist circles, but it has no place in yoga or any spiritual discipline. Yoga is about transcending the ego, uniting with the whole, dissolving division. CRT is about inflating the ego, dividing the world, and deepening division.

And if you find yourself in a teacher training or a spiritual community where CRT is being forced on you, know this: you don’t have to accept it. You can walk away. You can find teachers and communities who honor yoga for what it is, not for what activists want it to be.

That’s what I’ve chosen. That’s what I’m building in my own work — translations, reflections, practices rooted in tradition, not politics.

Because at the end of the day, yoga doesn’t belong to CRT. It belongs to practitioners.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Agniyana | Martial Arts, Healing & Inner Power

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading